home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: solon.com!not-for-mail
- From: The Amorphous Mass <robinson@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c.moderated
- Subject: Re: const pointer confusion...
- Date: 25 Mar 1996 06:21:26 -0600
- Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com
- Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com
- Message-ID: <4j6346$3et@solutions.solon.com>
- References: <4j06gm$7oa@solutions.solon.com> <4j41hs$nku@solutions.solon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com
- X-Sender: robinson@black.weeg.uiowa.edu
-
- On 24 Mar 1996, The Amorphous Mass wrote:
-
- > On 23 Mar 1996, Reed R. Mangino wrote:
- >
- > > 2) int *const p;
- > > p is a pointer to an integer. *p can be assigned to, but p can
- > > never be made to point to another address in memory, right?
- >
- > This is a syntax error.
-
- No it isn't. Flame at will. :-(
-
- /**James Robinson***********************
- "If a fatal error occurs, the program should not be allowed to continue."
- -- Oracle Pro*C User's Guide *************james-robinson@uiowa.edu**/
-